Guides / Project Playbooks

Design-build vs hiring separate trades: the honest comparison

Three ways to run a renovation, three very different bills, and the industry rarely explains where each one actually wins. Here's the straight version.

The three models

Where design-build earns its keep

The classic failure it prevents: pay a designer $8,000, fall in love with the drawings, then watch three GC bids land 60% over the design budget. Design-build prices as it draws, so the design converges on your budget instead of colliding with it. It also kills the designer-vs-builder blame game when a detail doesn't survive contact with the actual house, one throat to choke, one warranty, which matters double in old housing stock like Brantford's century homes where the house edits the design mid-build.

"The question I ask homeowners is never 'which model is best,' it's 'how many trades does your project touch and who's absorbing the surprises?' One trade: hire the trade. Defined multi-trade scope: hire a GC. Evolving design in an old house: design-build, because the design will change and someone has to own that without an invoice war."

Mitch Fraser, owner, Ontario Contracting Co.

The decision table

Whichever path you take, the paperwork stack is identical: the contract clauses in the twelve clauses a compliant contract needs, verified credentials per the insurance and WSIB routine, and permits in the right municipal system. We quote both GC and design-build engagements; the honest recommendation of which you actually need comes free with the site visit.

Want it done the way this guide describes?

Get My Free Quote